<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>UPDATE: 2026-15 AWARDS</title>
    <link>http://www.arbchek.com/updatearbchek.html?utm_source=organic&amp;utm_medium=rss</link>
    <description>Powered by ARBChek</description>
    <copyright>2026 Securities Arbitration Commentator, Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 02:25:34 -0400</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>
        <value>Morthland v. Charles Schwab, FINRA ID #24-00385 (Phoenix, AZ, 2026-09-10)</value>
      </title>
      <link>http://www.arbchek.com/updatearbchek.html?utm_source=organic&amp;utm_medium=rss#ua-24-00385</link>
      <description>In this elder abuse case, two customer trustees are awarded over $1.3 million in compensatory damages relating to their investment in Okcoin cryptocurrency.  Although he agreed with the awarding of compensatory damages, one Arbitrator dissented from his fellow Panelists and would have also awarded the customers interest, as well as their attorney fees and costs incurred in this matter as a precedent to deter these types of abuses against elderly investors in the future.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
        <value>Richards v. Centaurus Financial, FINRA ID #25-01764 (Phoenix, AZ, 2026-09-09)</value>
      </title>
      <link>http://www.arbchek.com/updatearbchek.html?utm_source=organic&amp;utm_medium=rss#ua-25-01764</link>
      <description>A Panel unanimously awards a broker expungement of a customer complaint from appearing on his CRD record after finding the complaint to be false.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
        <value>Ehlers v. Ameriprise Financial, FINRA ID #26-00263 (Phoenix, AZ, 2026-09-09)</value>
      </title>
      <link>http://www.arbchek.com/updatearbchek.html?utm_source=organic&amp;utm_medium=rss#ua-26-00263</link>
      <description>A Panel unanimously grants a broker's request for expungement of three customer complaints from appearing on his CRD record after finding said request met all three criteria under FINRA Rule 2080.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
        <value>Humongous Win v. Title3Funds LLC, FINRA ID #26-01122 (Tampa, FL, 2026-09-09)</value>
      </title>
      <link>http://www.arbchek.com/updatearbchek.html?utm_source=organic&amp;utm_medium=rss#ua-26-01122</link>
      <description>In this small claims arbitration, a corporate investor alleging that it was prevented from completing a planned Regulation Crowdfunding securities offering after Respondent broker-dealer engaged in a sequence of deceptive practices is awarded compensatory damages.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
        <value>Nham v. Fidelity Brokerage, FINRA ID #26-01167 (Tampa, FL, 2026-09-01)</value>
      </title>
      <link>http://www.arbchek.com/updatearbchek.html?utm_source=organic&amp;utm_medium=rss#ua-26-01167</link>
      <description>In this small claims arbitration, a customer alleging that Respondent broker-dealer's website prevented him from canceling an unauthorized purchase of MWC stock and as a result of the error he suffered a financial loss loses his case.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
        <value>Orcinolo v. Morgan Stanley, FINRA ID #26-00244 (Boca Raton, FL, 2026-09-08)</value>
      </title>
      <link>http://www.arbchek.com/updatearbchek.html?utm_source=organic&amp;utm_medium=rss#ua-26-00244</link>
      <description>A Panel awards a registered representative expungement of a customer complaint from appearing on his CRD record.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
        <value>Dempsey v. Cambridge Investment, FINRA ID #26-00504 (Atlanta, GA, 2026-09-04)</value>
      </title>
      <link>http://www.arbchek.com/updatearbchek.html?utm_source=organic&amp;utm_medium=rss#ua-26-00504</link>
      <description>Three brokers are each granted their respective requests for expungement of a customer complaint from appearing on their CRD records.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
        <value>Nakhasi v. Charles Schwab, FINRA ID #26-00428 (Des Moines, IA, 2026-09-11)</value>
      </title>
      <link>http://www.arbchek.com/updatearbchek.html?utm_source=organic&amp;utm_medium=rss#ua-26-00428</link>
      <description>In this small claims arbitration, a customer alleging that Respondent broker-dealer breached its fiduciary duty when it routed his purchase order of shares in VanEck Russia ETF to an individual investor instead of the VanEck Fund and for its failure to inform him of such, as well as the President's Executive Order that prohibited the sale of Russian-affiliated securities loses his case.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
        <value>Fryer v. JP Morgan, FINRA ID #25-00167 (Chicago, IL, 2026-09-02)</value>
      </title>
      <link>http://www.arbchek.com/updatearbchek.html?utm_source=organic&amp;utm_medium=rss#ua-25-00167</link>
      <description>A broker alleging wrongful termination and seeking reformation of defamatory information from his Form U5 record loses his case with prejudice.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
        <value>Frost v. Horace Mann, FINRA ID #24-00122 (Boston, MA, 2026-09-03)</value>
      </title>
      <link>http://www.arbchek.com/updatearbchek.html?utm_source=organic&amp;utm_medium=rss#ua-24-00122</link>
      <description>Registered Rep alleging breach of contract and seeking reformation of defamatory information from appearing on her Form U5 record loses her case.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
        <value>Cavallaro v. OSAIC Wealth, FINRA ID #25-01225 (Boston, MA, 2026-09-04)</value>
      </title>
      <link>http://www.arbchek.com/updatearbchek.html?utm_source=organic&amp;utm_medium=rss#ua-25-01225</link>
      <description>Registered Rep is granted his request for expungement of five customer complaints from appearing on his CRD record.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
        <value>Masel v. Morgan Stanley, FINRA ID #26-01386 (Boston, MA, 2026-09-03)</value>
      </title>
      <link>http://www.arbchek.com/updatearbchek.html?utm_source=organic&amp;utm_medium=rss#ua-26-01386</link>
      <description>A Panel unanimously grants a broker's request for expungement of a customer complaint from appearing on his CRD record.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
        <value>Connelly v. Merrill Lynch, FINRA ID #25-02787 (Minneapolis, MN, 2026-09-10)</value>
      </title>
      <link>http://www.arbchek.com/updatearbchek.html?utm_source=organic&amp;utm_medium=rss#ua-25-02787</link>
      <description>Registered Rep is granted her request for expungement of a customer complaint from appearing on her CRD record after the Panel found that all three criteria were met under FINRA Rule 2080 to award said relief.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
        <value>Yvars v. OSAIC Wealth, FINRA ID #26-00783 (Manchester, NH, 2026-09-04)</value>
      </title>
      <link>http://www.arbchek.com/updatearbchek.html?utm_source=organic&amp;utm_medium=rss#ua-26-00783</link>
      <description>A Panel unanimously denies, with prejudice, Claimant broker's request for expungement of two customer complaints from appearing on his CRD record.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
        <value>GTS Securities v. StoneX Financial, FINRA ID #25-00648 (New York, NY, 2026-09-02)</value>
      </title>
      <link>http://www.arbchek.com/updatearbchek.html?utm_source=organic&amp;utm_medium=rss#ua-25-00648</link>
      <description>In this intra-industry case, a FINRA member firm alleging that Respondent broker-dealer breached its contract when it failed to deliver requested dividend values is awarded compensatory damages.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
        <value>Aldemajji v. Interactive Brokers, FINRA ID #26-00507 (New York, NY, 2026-09-01)</value>
      </title>
      <link>http://www.arbchek.com/updatearbchek.html?utm_source=organic&amp;utm_medium=rss#ua-26-00507</link>
      <description>In this small claims arbitration, a customer alleging that due to a notification delay while using Respondent broker-dealer's online platform, he suffered realized losses is denied his request for damages.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
        <value>Swensson v. Lodestar Securities, FINRA ID #25-02611 (New York, NY, 2026-09-11)</value>
      </title>
      <link>http://www.arbchek.com/updatearbchek.html?utm_source=organic&amp;utm_medium=rss#ua-25-02611</link>
      <description>An Arbitrator grants a registered representative's request for reformation of defamatory information from appearing on his Form U5 record.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
        <value>Chiappetta v. Cambridge Investment, FINRA ID #25-02081 (Milwaukee, WI, 2026-08-31)</value>
      </title>
      <link>http://www.arbchek.com/updatearbchek.html?utm_source=organic&amp;utm_medium=rss#ua-25-02081</link>
      <description>Registered Rep is granted his request for expungement of a customer complaint from appearing on his CRD record after the Panel found that said request met all three criteria under FINRA Rule 2080.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
